Skip to content

Module 8: Capstone — Production Multi-Agent System

Overview

Build, deploy, and evaluate a complete production-grade multi-agent system. Choose from three project options, or propose your own.


Project Options

Option 1: Brand Monitor (Intermediate)

Build a multi-agent system that monitors how LLMs mention a brand across multiple AI services.

Agents:

  • Scanner Agent — queries ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity for brand mentions
  • Analyzer Agent — classifies mentions as positive/negative/neutral
  • Reporter Agent — generates daily summary reports

Requirements:

  • Each agent has domain-locked permissions
  • Each agent maintains a mental model
  • Scanner uses cascade routing (Flash for scrape, Sonnet for analysis)
  • Daily automated runs via heartbeat
  • Cost tracking per scan

Option 2: Code Review Pipeline (Intermediate-Advanced)

A plan → build → review → verify chain with CI/CD integration.

Agents:

  • Planner — reads spec, creates implementation plan
  • Builder — writes code per plan
  • Reviewer — reviews code for bugs, style, security
  • Verifier — read-only agent that checks all claims

Requirements:

  • YAML-defined agent chain pipeline
  • Golden dataset for regression testing
  • Verifier agent with confidence ladder
  • GitHub PR integration
  • Cost analysis per review cycle

Option 3: Strategic Decision Board (Advanced)

An 8-agent CEO board with adversarial debate, fact verification, and execution planning.

Agents:

  • CEO (orchestrator)
  • 6 board members with distinct perspectives
  • Verifier (fact-checker)
  • Tracker (quarterly review)

Requirements:

  • Each board member has distinct persona + mental model
  • Fact verification (2+ sources per claim)
  • Contrarian position tracked at 3x weight
  • Structured memo output
  • Audio summary (TTS)
  • Cost tracking per deliberation

Capstone Phases

Phase 1: System Design (60-90 min)

Deliverable: One-page architecture document including:

  • System diagram (agents + data flow + tool surface)
  • Agent roster (names, personas, domain permissions)
  • Data model (what state is shared, how)
  • Security architecture (what L-level, what hooks)
  • Cost estimate per session

Template:

markdown
# System Design: [Project Name]

## Architecture
[ASCII diagram or mermaid]

## Agent Roster
| Agent | Model | Tools | Domain | Memory |
|-------|-------|-------|--------|--------|

## Data Flow
[How agents communicate, what state they share]

## Security
[L-level, hooks, verifier, damage-control rules]

## Cost Estimate
[Per-session estimate with model pricing]

Phase 2: Agent Implementation (2-4 hours)

Build each agent:

  • System prompt with persona + behavioral rules
  • Tool definitions with reasoning parameter
  • Mental model file (agent-owned expertise)
  • Skills for composable behavior

Phase 3: Integration (1-2 hours)

Wire agents together:

  • Chain (if pipeline pattern)
  • Team (if dispatcher pattern)
  • P2P (if flat pattern)
  • Shared context (conversation log)

Phase 4: Security Hardening (1-2 hours)

Apply security layer:

  • Minimum L3 (blacklist hook)
  • Target L4 (whitelist hook)
  • Optional L5 (no bash)
  • Damage-control rules
  • Verifier agent (read-only checks)

Phase 5: Testing & Evaluation (1-2 hours)

  • Create golden dataset (10+ test cases)
  • Run pass@k evaluation (k=3, k=5)
  • Calculate cost per task
  • Identify optimization opportunities

Phase 6: Deployment (1-2 hours)

  • CI/CD pipeline with golden dataset gate
  • Shadow deployment vs baseline
  • Observability: every tool call + cost logged
  • Monitoring dashboard

Phase 7: Review & Iterate (1 hour)

  • Red-team your own system (try to break it)
  • Document lessons learned
  • Create retrospective

Deliverables Checklist

[ ] Architecture document (one page, with diagram)
[ ] All agent source code with system prompts
[ ] Mental model files for each agent
[ ] Security configuration (damage-control rules)
[ ] Verifier agent (if applicable)
[ ] Golden dataset (10+ test cases)
[ ] Test results (pass@k at k=1, k=3, k=5)
[ ] Cost analysis ($/task, optimization opportunities)
[ ] Security audit (which L-level, what gaps remain)
[ ] Retrospective (max 1 page)

Pass Criteria

CriterionMinimumTarget
System runs without manual intervention
All agents have domain-locked permissions
Each agent has mental model file
pass@k (k=3) on golden dataset>60%>80%
Cost analysis within 2x of optimal
Security audit identifies ≥2 improvements
Observability captures all tool calls
Architecture document submitted

Grading Rubric

AreaWeightPoor (0)Good (1)Excellent (2)
Architecture20%No diagram, unclear designDiagram present, mostly clearClear diagram, justified choices
Implementation25%Agents don't workAgents work on happy pathAgents handle errors gracefully
Security20%L1 onlyL3+ with damage-controlL4+ with verifier
Testing15%No evalpass@k computedpass@k + cost analysis + grind detection
Documentation10%MinimalArchitecture + setupArchitecture + setup + retrospective
Cost Optimization10%Single modelCascade routingCascade + verified savings

FDSA Agency — Agentic Engineering Course. Part of the fdsa.ai orchestration platform.