docs(tac): add external agent safety anchors
Ground TAC loop-engineering guidance in external production references: NVIDIA Secure Agent Workspace, Infisical Agent Vault, Anthropic agent evals, and OWASP AI Agent Security. Lock signed-action-only deploy posture and research markers with pytest.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1f97ba1cd
commit
4f7ae7ffe1
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ def test_loop_engineering_meta_prompt_locks_safety_fields():
|
||||||
"Team manages agents",
|
"Team manages agents",
|
||||||
"vault/proxy credential injection",
|
"vault/proxy credential injection",
|
||||||
"YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`",
|
"YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`",
|
||||||
|
"External research anchors",
|
||||||
|
"NVIDIA Secure Agent Workspace",
|
||||||
|
"Infisical Agent Vault",
|
||||||
|
"Anthropic agent evals",
|
||||||
|
"OWASP AI Agent Security Cheat Sheet",
|
||||||
|
"signed-action-only",
|
||||||
"Model Workspace Protocol",
|
"Model Workspace Protocol",
|
||||||
"00-intake/",
|
"00-intake/",
|
||||||
"40-ship/",
|
"40-ship/",
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,19 @@ Every autonomous work-agent plan must include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Reference: Latent Space, "The Blueprint for Autonomous Work Agents" with Gavriel Cohen / NanoClaw (YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`).
|
Reference: Latent Space, "The Blueprint for Autonomous Work Agents" with Gavriel Cohen / NanoClaw (YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## External research anchors
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ground agent plans against external production guidance, not just video notes:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- NVIDIA Secure Agent Workspace: always-on agents need a managed workspace with credential proxy, enterprise tool access, governance, and runtime controls.
|
||||||
|
- Infisical Agent Vault: secrets stay in the vault and requests receive credentials through a proxy; agents must not hold raw secrets.
|
||||||
|
- Anthropic agent evals: judge trajectories and environment outcomes, not just final answers.
|
||||||
|
- OWASP AI Agent Security Cheat Sheet: treat prompt injection, memory poisoning, tool abuse, sandboxing, and access control as first-class risks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These anchors support TAC's local rule: deploy remains signed-action-only through `git-proxy:8099/deploy`; do not reintroduce raw command deploy paths.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
References: NVIDIA Secure Agent Workspace (`docs.nvidia.com/enterprise-reference-architectures/secure-agent-workspace-reference-design`), Infisical Agent Vault (`infisical.com/blog/agent-vault-the-open-source-credential-proxy-and-vault-for-agents`), Anthropic "Demystifying evals for AI agents" (`anthropic.com/engineering/demystifying-evals-for-ai-agents`), OWASP AI Agent Security Cheat Sheet (`cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/AI_Agent_Security_Cheat_Sheet.html`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Model Workspace Protocol note
|
## Model Workspace Protocol note
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For sequential workflows with human review between stages, prefer folder-structured orchestration before multi-agent framework code. The Model Workspace Protocol pattern treats numbered folders as stages, markdown files as role/context carriers, and local scripts as the boring mechanical layer.
|
For sequential workflows with human review between stages, prefer folder-structured orchestration before multi-agent framework code. The Model Workspace Protocol pattern treats numbered folders as stages, markdown files as role/context carriers, and local scripts as the boring mechanical layer.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue