docs(tac): add codex product-work guidance
Capture the Codex product-work interview in TAC loop-engineering guidance. Preserve PRD/spec discipline, prototypes, human taste/systems review, receipt-gated background agents, and explicit ownership even when implementation gets cheaper.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f7ae7ffe1
commit
becd314b8f
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ def test_loop_engineering_meta_prompt_locks_safety_fields():
|
|||
"Team manages agents",
|
||||
"vault/proxy credential injection",
|
||||
"YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`",
|
||||
"Product work with coding agents",
|
||||
"human taste and systems thinking",
|
||||
"YouTube `P3KDebPTUrw`",
|
||||
"External research anchors",
|
||||
"NVIDIA Secure Agent Workspace",
|
||||
"Infisical Agent Vault",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -85,6 +85,18 @@ Every autonomous work-agent plan must include:
|
|||
|
||||
Reference: Latent Space, "The Blueprint for Autonomous Work Agents" with Gavriel Cohen / NanoClaw (YouTube `hLUGXO5DSpo`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Product work with coding agents note
|
||||
|
||||
When implementation gets cheap, do not delete product discipline. Plans should use prototypes to explore, but still preserve the product loop:
|
||||
|
||||
- PRD/spec captures why, users, constraints, and success criteria;
|
||||
- prototype makes options concrete and testable;
|
||||
- human taste and systems thinking review whether the result fits the whole product;
|
||||
- scheduled/background agents may gather context, but promotion still needs receipts and review;
|
||||
- role boundaries can flex, but ownership, decision rights, and phase state must stay explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference: Lenny's Podcast, "OpenAI Codex lead on the new shape of product work" with Andrew Ambrosino (YouTube `P3KDebPTUrw`).
|
||||
|
||||
## External research anchors
|
||||
|
||||
Ground agent plans against external production guidance, not just video notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue