import{c as e,Q as n,j as t,m as s}from"./chunks/framework.BPKcPtvA.js";const u=JSON.parse('{"title":"Non-Technical Track: Decision Frameworks for AI Agents","description":"","frontmatter":{},"headers":[],"relativePath":"modules/non-technical.md","filePath":"modules/non-technical.md","lastUpdated":1780488246000}'),i={name:"modules/non-technical.md"};function o(r,a,l,d,p,c){return n(),t("div",null,[...a[0]||(a[0]=[s(`

Non-Technical Track: Decision Frameworks for AI Agents

For Managers, PMs, and Decision-Makers


Framework 1: "Should We Use an Agent for This?"

The 4-Question Filter (for non-technical stakeholders)

Q1: Can a human do this task with clear step-by-step instructions?

Q2: Does the task have clear success criteria?

Q3: What's the cost of failure?

Q4: How many times does this task need to be done?

Decision Matrix

               Low Failure Cost    High Failure Cost
──────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────
High Volume   │  Build agent      │  Agent + HITL
Low Volume    │  Do it manually   │  Do it manually

Framework 2: The 4 Agent Design Patterns (Andrew Ng)

1. Reflection

The agent checks its own work before presenting it.

Agent writes code → reviews own code → fixes issues → presents final

Business value: Reduces human review time by 40-60%. Catches obvious errors before they reach you.

2. Tool Use

The agent uses external tools to gather information or take actions.

Agent reason → call search API → read results → call database → compose answer

Business value: Agents can access real-time data, not just training data. Turns a static LLM into a live system.

3. Planning

The agent decomposes a complex request into sub-steps.

"Build a landing page" → plan steps (1. Design, 2. Code, 3. Test, 4. Deploy)
                         → execute each step → verify results

Business value: Complex tasks get done without step-by-step human instruction. The agent figures out the steps.

4. Multi-Agent Collaboration

Multiple specialized agents work together on different parts of a task.

PM agent plans → Designer creates mockup → Frontend builds → QA tests

Business value: Each agent is an expert in its domain. Together they outperform one generalist agent at a fraction of the cost.


Framework 3: Cost Estimation for Agent Projects

The 3x Rule

A production agent costs 3x your prototype estimate. Plan accordingly.

PhaseCost MultiplierWhat's Included
Prototype (works on happy path)1xSingle agent, one model, no safety
Production (handles edge cases)2xRetry logic, error handling, testing
Production+ (operational)3xMonitoring, security, CI/CD, budgets

Quick Cost Calculator

Per-task cost = (input_tokens × input_price + output_tokens × output_price) × retry_rate × overhead

Where:
  retry_rate = 1.5 (typical for agent systems)
  overhead = 3.0 (production multiplier)

Example:
  Agent session: 4000 input tokens, 1000 output tokens
  Model: Claude Sonnet ($3/$15 per M tokens)
  
  Base cost: (4000 × $3/M + 1000 × $15/M) = $0.012 + $0.015 = $0.027
  With retries: $0.027 × 1.5 = $0.041
  Production cost: $0.041 × 3.0 = $0.123 per task
  
  At 1000 tasks/month: $123/month
  At 10000 tasks/month: $1230/month

Cost by Autonomy Level

LevelCost/TaskHuman Time/TaskBest For
No agent$030 minOne-off tasks
AI-assisted$0.01-0.0510 minHuman does the work, AI helps
Agent with review$0.05-0.305 minAgent works, human reviews
Full autonomy$0.10-1.000 minAgent works, human audits
Multi-agent$0.50-5.002 minComplex workflows, human supervises

Framework 4: Autonomy vs Risk Matrix

                    Low Risk              Medium Risk           High Risk
                    (suggestions,         (code gen, data       (financial, medical,
                     content gen)          processing)           infrastructure)
─────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Tier 1:      │ Full autonomy           │ Agent + review      │ Human only
Simple       │                         │                     │
             │                         │                     │
Tier 2:      │ Agent + review          │ Agent + verifier +  │ Human + agent
Complex      │                         │ human spot-check    │ as tool
             │                         │                     │
Tier 3:      │ Multi-agent + audit     │ Multi-agent +       │ Not recommended
Strategic    │                         │ verifier + human    │ for agents

Framework 5: The "Build vs Buy" Decision

Build an Agent When:

Buy/Rent When:

Hybrid When:


Framework 6: Measuring Success

Leading Indicators (week 1-4)

Lagging Indicators (month 2-3+)

Red Flags


Framework 7: Governance & Compliance Quick Reference

Regulatory Requirements by Region

RequirementEU (AI Act)California (SB 1047)UK/Japan
Human oversightMandatory for high-riskMandatory kill-switchVoluntary
Audit trailsRequiredRequiredRecommended
Incident reportingRequiredRequiredVoluntary
Disclosure (AI-generated)RequiredRequiredRecommended
Data privacy (GDPR)Full complianceSimilarDifferent standard

Minimum Viable Governance

For teams not in regulated industries, start with:

  1. Every agent action is logged with timestamp, agent, input, output
  2. Human review gate for destructive operations (deletes, writes, spending money)
  3. Monthly cost report per agent per task type
  4. Quarterly security review — has the agent's behavior changed?

Summary: Decision Flow

1. Can this task be automated?
   ├── No → Do it manually
   └── Yes →
2. What's the failure cost?
   ├── High → Human-in-the-loop mandatory
   └── Low →
3. What's the volume?
   ├── <10/month → Do it manually
   ├── 10-100/month → Build a script
   └── >100/month → Build an agent
4. How many specialists needed?
   ├── One → Single agent
   └── Multiple → Multi-agent system
5. What's the budget?
   ├── <$50/month → Use cheapest model (Gemini Flash)
   ├── $50-500/month → Cascade routing (mix models)
   └── >$500/month → Multi-agent with verification
`,71)])])}const m=e(i,[["render",o]]);export{u as __pageData,m as default};