docs: position fable-agent against workflow wrappers
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3524669b1
commit
12a733dd52
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
||||||
|
# Competition: FableCodex / pi-fable / fable-agent
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Positioning
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
FableCodex and pi-fable add Fable-style workflow discipline.
|
||||||
|
fable-agent adds the missing verification substrate: typed attestations, security scanners, risk gates, and guarded deploy receipts.
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Market map
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Project | Layer | Strength | fable-agent wedge |
|
||||||
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
|
| FableCodex | Codex workflow skill | Inspect-first, goal ledger, evidence before done | Runtime-independent attestations and security checks |
|
||||||
|
| pi-fable | Pi package / subagent workflow | Pi-native routing, findings gate, verifier agents | Factory-aware verification, deploy route evidence, typed receipts |
|
||||||
|
| fable-agent | Verification/control plane | Receipts, AST/glyph/content safety, verify-cycle, guarded deploy | Proves agent work instead of only guiding it |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Product category
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Agentic attestation infrastructure.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Not an AI factory. Not an orchestrator marketplace. Not a model unlocker.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
fable-agent verifies agent work with:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- typed attestation schema: `fable.verification.attestation.v1`
|
||||||
|
- verified vs unverified claim separation
|
||||||
|
- AST structural capability scanner
|
||||||
|
- glyph/covert-channel scanner
|
||||||
|
- content safety and adaptive reframing gate
|
||||||
|
- build/test/docs checks
|
||||||
|
- risk-based human review gate
|
||||||
|
- guarded deploy route recording
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Strategic contrast
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### FableCodex says
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Make Codex behave more carefully.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### pi-fable says
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Make Pi subagents behave more carefully.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### fable-agent says
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Prove what agent work did, what verified it, what risk remains, and whether guarded deploy is allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Deploy fact discipline
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For fable-agent guarded deploy decisions:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- current route: `8099/deploy via git-proxy`
|
||||||
|
- legacy/stale direct deploy service: `8098 deploy-webhook`
|
||||||
|
- memory is not proof; receipts are proof
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Default command
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```bash
|
||||||
|
fable-agent verify . --out .fable/attestations/latest.json
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
or:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```bash
|
||||||
|
fable-agent factory verify . --out .fable/attestations/factory-latest.json
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Do not copy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Do not copy competitor ceremony unless it creates proof. Avoid:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- bigger ledgers for their own sake
|
||||||
|
- dashboard before receipts are boring green
|
||||||
|
- marketplace before typed objects are stable
|
||||||
|
- generic self-healing claims without degraded-repair receipts
|
||||||
|
- direct legacy `8098` deploy assumptions
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue